If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. https://paste1s.com/notes/X9KZHQRR look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. https://te.legra.ph/The-particular-Proteckd-Garment-Is-The-Most-Effective-EMF-Protection-That-Can-Become-Purchased-03-25 do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for best 5g emf protection for home with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.